In the Cost/Benefits step, what is asked about if the problem is not resolved?

In the Cost/Benefits step, what is asked about if the problem is not resolved?

• A. The Short-term and Long-term Benefits
• B. The Short-term and Long-term Costs
• C. Time to Resolve
• D. Legal Consequences

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is to weigh outcomes based on action versus inaction. When the problem isn’t resolved, the question asks you to consider the costs that come from leaving it unresolved. You look at short-term costs (immediate distress, ongoing disruption, extra resources needed) and long-term costs (persistent problems, greater risk of relapse or complications). This focus helps you understand the consequences of not solving the problem and why addressing it could be worthwhile. Time to resolve is about how long it would take to fix things, not the costs of not fixing them, and legal consequences, while potentially relevant in some contexts, aren’t the primary concern in this specific cost/benefit lens.

The main idea here is to weigh outcomes based on action versus inaction. When the problem isn’t resolved, the question asks you to consider the costs that come from leaving it unresolved. You look at short-term costs (immediate distress, ongoing disruption, extra resources needed) and long-term costs (persistent problems, greater risk of relapse or complications). This focus helps you understand the consequences of not solving the problem and why addressing it could be worthwhile. Time to resolve is about how long it would take to fix things, not the costs of not fixing them, and legal consequences, while potentially relevant in some contexts, aren’t the primary concern in this specific cost/benefit lens.